Archive for the ‘General Transit’ Category

Sharing the Road with LRVs

Friday, September 3rd, 2010

Vic Roads has produced the following video about sharing the roads with trams in Melbourne. This sort of video could be very useful here in Toronto, though the Province of Ontario could learn a few things from the State of Victoria where it comes to rules for traffic with streetcars and LRVs.

The video outlines the fines for not obeying the rules, and near the end it has a demonstration on how hook turns are performed.

Special thanks to Joshua Odell for bringing this to my attention.

How To Spot a Liar: Look For The Promise of Subways

Friday, June 18th, 2010

Sure, the headline is a rather broad statement, but it pretty much sums up most candidates in the municipal election, both mayoral and council. Now, I also understand the inflammatory nature of the word ‘Liar’, as I am taking some liberties in its use. I know of people who believe a lie to be any untruth, regardless of whether or not the person stating it is aware of its truthfulness or not. However, given that many of the candidates have either been involved in the operation of the city in one way or another for sometime, they should have a good idea of just how things work and don’t work, or at least they should. (more…)

SRT: What To Look Forward To

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

With the funding deferment pushing back the conversion of the SRT until after 2015, the plan includes buying some used ICTS Mark-I cars from Vancouver.

Want a look at what is in store for us, take a look at this article which details a recent derailment in Surrey. Of course, with drivers on the SRT, the result would not be the same, but we are still talking about purchasing used equipment that has things like brake calipers falling off of it.

A Good Day on the TTC

Thursday, May 20th, 2010

I had to travel downtown last evening for a meeting in the Queen/Broadview area and took transit as I usually do for this sort of thing. While I cannot claim that it was a good day for all operation on the TTC yesterday, I experienced a couple of incidents that made for a more pleasant trip than usual that are worth mentioning. I have already filed a complement for these with the TTC, and I strongly recommend others file complements when warranted.

I was a little pleased when I did not have to wait more than a couple of minutes for an eastbound Queen car at Yonge along with a huge crowd that was growing by the minute, but this was not the reason for the complement. The operator of ALRV 4234 at about 6:45 pm was unusually helpful by supplementing some of the automated stop announcements with information on connecting routes where they existed. What really stood out was the announcement she made when we were approaching Parliament. In addition to the information on the Parliament bus, she made an apology for the wait for her car. She explained that the car ahead of hers had mechanical problems at Humber and needed to be taken out of service, causing a gap. She ended the message with a comment to the effect of, “hopefully, we will be getting new streetcars soon.”

The pleasant sounding message, combined with the humour, made for a nice atmosphere on board. I would be willing to bet that most everyone on board left that streetcar with a positive memory of the trip. This is a good thing that should be encouraged.

Though not as notable, but still a positive memory incident, the later trip back west was on a King car, CLRV 4071 at about 9:20 pm,  that had its automated stop announcement system declare that the car was going out of service at Church and would be turning. This was not the case and the operator quickly got on the PA and announced that “the lady does not know what she is speaking of” and that the streetcar would be continuing straight and in service.

Two separate laughter-inspiring incidents in one day. I call that a good day on the TTC.

Toronto Doomed to a Leaderless Mayor

Tuesday, May 4th, 2010

The Toronto mayoral race is filled with candidates that all lack leadership. Each and everyone of the candidates of note have kowtowed to the “we need more subways” chant. Not one candidate has the leadership qualities to be able to sell a transit vision that incorporates the appropriate modes where necessary.

Even Rob Ford, known for his fiscal responsible nature is out to lunch when he downplays all LRT plans in favour of subways. Fiscal responsibility should dictate that numerous corridors in this city are far better served with LRT technology over subways. Ford would also focus on buses, which again run counter to the idea of fiscal responsibility as they are far more expensive to operate than LRT trains on a per passenger basis.

Rocco Rossi comes out today with a vision-less idea he calls “Transit City Plus”. It is a plan to sell off certain city assets to pay off the city’s debt, which would free up $450 million per year that the city is currently paying in interest on that debt. Thus, that money could go into transit funding to the tune of $4.5 billion over the next ten years. I call this vision-less because he has no specific vision for what this will build, but he sees 2 km of tunnels and one subway station per year. We all know how well that idea has served us over the past four decades: councillors will fight over who’s constituency will get the next 2 kilometres, and we will end up with NOTHING getting built.

Then there is that wonderful plan of Sarah Thomson who would add a $5 toll on the Toronto-controlled expressways to pay for, wait for it, subway construction. Of course, she fails to realize that a chunk of the traffic on expressways will move to nearby arteries. This in turn slows traffic on those streets and since our subway system works on feeder bus routes, those streets will need more buses in order to provide the current capacity. Not as much of that $5 toll will be available to fund subway lines because more buses will have to be purchased, and their cost of operation will have to come from somewhere.

Numerous candidates have been using the term “Streetcar City” when referring to “Transit City”. For the most part, I find this offensive because Transit City is an LRT plan and not a streetcar plan, but at the same time I do not have complete faith that the TTC has the ability to properly implement a true LRT system. Some of the plans that they appear hard pressed to budge on indicate a very streetcar-oriented frame of mind, particularly with the Eglinton-Crosstown line.

Quite frankly, the Eglinton-Crosstown line must be designed to protect for high capacity all the way from Jane to Don Mills. The tunnelled section is a little short of this length and the design uses only median running for the remainder, when separate right of way options are very viable for these locations.

Though the Don Mills LRT is not part of the first phase of Transit City, what open houses the TTC has held on this line suggests that they insist on shoehorning it onto streets that simply do not have room for an LRT line. With that mindset, is it any wonder why the term “Streetcar City” is being bandied about?

A true leader would take a good look at where new subways are really beneficial to the network as a whole, and where LRT is the best mode, and come up with a plan that would benefit all, and then sell it to the public. If that means cherry-picking parts of the Transit City plan and altering others than so be it. Instead, since Transit City is tainted by David Miller, it must be all bad and must be shunned at every opportunity. Let us all spend billions where it is unnecessary because to do otherwise would be to somehow acknowledge that any of the excess spending under David Miller was somehow acceptable.